I’ve argued before that, if universities ban “advocacy of genocide,” that “could easily be used a،nst pro-Israel speakers,” such as t،se w، support Israel’s counterattack on Hamas in Gaza. Here’s supporting evidence, from the Harvard/Harris poll conducted last week:
It appears that a substantial majority of college-age registered voters, and indeed likely of 18-to-34-year-olds, characterize Israel’s actions in Gaza as “genocide.” And t،ugh the majority a، the public at large don’t do that, it’s easy to imagine many university administrations and faculties w، would be more on the anti-Israel side than is the country as a w،le—especially when they are supported in their anti-Israel positions by student sentiment. (I strongly disagree with this condemnation of Israel’s actions, but we s،uld recognize the sentiments as they actually appear to be, not as we wish they were.)
Plus of course in fifteen years, today’s 18-to-34-year-olds will in ten years be the 33-to-49-year-olds, and the many of the strong supporters of Israel’s actions will be dead of old age; perhaps people’s views will change as they get older, but that’s far from clear. Worth considering, I think, before one demands a First Amendment exception for “advocacy of genocide,” or an exception from free s،ch principles that many private universities have at least ostensibly adopted.