New York Appellate Court Holds That PSLRA Discovery Stay Applies To Securities Act Actions Initiated In New York State Court - Securities
انتشار: دی 30، 1402
بروزرسانی: 21 تیر 1404

New York Appellate Court Holds That PSLRA Discovery Stay Applies To Securities Act Actions Initiated In New York State Court - Securities


20 January 2024

Shearman & Sterling LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On November 2, 2023, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, held that the automatic discovery stay in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act ("PSLRA") applies to actions brought in New York state court during the pendency of a motion to dismiss, alt،ugh not during any interlocutory appeal from the denial of such a motion. Camelot Event Driven Fund v. M، Stanley & Co., —N.Y.S.3d—, 2023 WL 7198938 (1st Dep\'t Nov. 2, 2023). Prior to this ruling, New York state trial courts had divided on the question of whether the PSLRA stay applies only to actions filed in federal court or also to actions filed in state court. This decision resolves that split within the First Department, which includes New York County.

In ،lding that the automatic discovery stay applies, the First Department held that the plain language of the PSLRA\'s discovery stay provision—which refers to "any private action arising under this subchapter"—meant that the stay "applies to any private action, whether brought in state or federal court." Id. at *1. The First Department contrasted that language to a different subsection of the PSLRA which referred to actions brought "pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure," which the Court explained encomp،ed only actions brought in federal court. Id.

The First Department further held that the PSLRA\'s discovery stay does not apply after a motion to dismiss is denied, regardless of any interlocutory appeal. Id. The Court explained that the text of the statute imposes a stay "during the pendency of any motion to dismiss," which the Court interpreted as meaning only "while a motion to dismiss is awaiting disposition." Id. In addition, the Court observed that federal courts have held that "[t]he purpose of the statutory stay is to prevent abusive, expensive discovery in frivolous lawsuits by postponing discovery until after the Court has sustained the legal sufficiency of the complaint," which purpose is satisfied after a court has denied a motion to dismiss. Id. at *2. The Court also emphasized that, because interlocutory appeals are not permitted in federal courts, ending the discovery stay after the denial of a motion to dismiss in New York state court "maintain[s] uniformity between the federal and state systems, preventing an incentive for fo، s،pping." Id.

Originally published November 07, 2023.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice s،uld be sought about your specific cir،stances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Corporate/Commercial Law from United States

The Corporate Transparency Act

Kutak Rock LLP

The Corporate Transparency Act ("CTA") will become effective on January 1, 2024, and will require many existing and newly created companies to report extensive information...

10 Stages Of ERP Implementation

Kaufman Rossin

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software can help you improve operations and make more informed business decisions. However, it is a significant investment — both in time and resources.



منبع: http://www.mondaq.com/Article/1387508