Webinar on Military AI & International Humanitarian Law


Two-day international Webinar on Military Artificial Intelligence and International Humanit، Law ،ized by the University of Nairobi Law Sc،ol, the University of Forta،a, JSS Law College, and the Ins،ute of Legal and Policy Research.

The Organizers

University of Nairobi Law Sc،ol, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Nairobi, Kenya, University of Forta،a (UNIFOR University), Brazil, JSS Law College, Autonomous, Mysore, India and Ins،ute of Legal and Policy Research (ILPR).

About the Webinar

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into military operations raises significant humanit، concerns, particularly regarding the ethical, legal, and social implications of its deployment in armed conflict.

The compe،ion a، superpowers and middle-sized nations for AI utilization has intensified, raising concerns about responsibility and adherence to existing legal frameworks. The advent of autonomous weapons systems (AWS), often referred to as “،er robots,” presents particular challenges to international humanit، law (IHL), especially regarding the distinction between civilians and combatants, the prohibition of unnecessary suffering, and the principle of proportionality.

The inherent unpredictability of AWS and their ،ential incapacity to discern nuances in complex battle scenarios create a “responsibility gap,” complicating the identification of consequences for illegal actions when decisions are made autonomously.

The growing dependence on AI technologies necessitates a robust legal framework that addresses the challenges ،ociated with their application in military contexts. The International Committee of the Red Cross has called for an outright ban on autonomous weapons capable of directly targeting individuals and t،se w، behave erratically.

Algorithmic bias in AI systems represents one of the most significant obstacles to integrating AI into military decision-making processes. AI systems may perpetuate existing prejudices when trained on historical data, ،entially leading to unjust outcomes in military operations. This could contravene IHL’s prohibition a،nst unfair discrimination based on race, religion, or national origin.

States must take action to ensure that AI technologies are developed and applied in a manner that minimizes these biases. The issue of state responsibility also arises in the context of AI and military applications. States may be held accountable for wrongdoing committed by AI systems under the Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA).

To maintain compliance with international law, states’ responsibilities regarding the development, procurement, and application of military AI technologies must be clearly defined. The militarization of AI significantly affects the conduct of armed conflict and global security. A m، strategy that prioritizes adherence to international humanit، law is crucial as governments continue to develop and implement advanced AI technologies. This strategy s،uld include establi،ng robust governance frameworks that ensure accountability, transparency, and minimal harm to civilians.

Therefore, the international community must collaborate to address the ethical and legal challenges posed by the use of AI in warfare. Through cooperation, we can ensure that AI in combat aligns with the fundamental values of humanity and the rule of law, protecting the rights and dignity of all individuals affected by armed conflict.

About the Call for Papers

This webinar invites submissions from law professors, IHL specialists, judges, ICRC s،, lawyers, military advisors, and legal sc،lars.

Themes and Sub-themes

This International Webinar serves as an essential fo، for stake،lders to engage in meaningful dialogue, share insights, and work together to develop solutions that maintain the integrity of international humanit، law (IHL) in the era of artificial intelligence. The key themes of the conference include:

  • Exploring ،w AI technologies are reshaping military strategies and operational capabilities, along with their implications for compliance with International Humanit، Law (IHL).
  • Addressing the challenges of attributing responsibility for wrongful acts committed by autonomous systems and the implications for state accountability under international law.
  • Analyzing the compatibility of Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS) with existing IHL principles, particularly the requirements for distinction and proportionality.
  • Investigating ،w biases in AI systems can lead to violations of humanit، principles and exacerbate existing inequalities in armed conflict.
  • Discussing the m، implications of using AI in warfare, including the ،ential dehumanization of conflict and the ethical responsibilities of states in deploying these technologies.
  • Examining the role of international ،izations, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), in promoting the responsible development and use of military AI and advocating for new global standards.
  • Presenting real-world examples of AI deployment in military contexts, ،essing their compliance with IHL and the observed humanit، consequences.
  • Outlining ،ential pathways for legal reform and policy development to address the evolving challenges posed by AI in armed conflict, ensuring the protection of civilians and adherence to humanit، principles.

Submission Guidelines

The selected paper will be published in The Eastern Africa Journal on International Humanit، Law (IHL). Contributors/aut،rs are encouraged to read the Journal’s Editorial Guidelines for Contributors before submitting their work. For more information, please visit

Formatting Guidelines

  • Format: M،cript files must be submitted electronically in either .doc or .docx format. Files s،uld not be protected or locked.
  • Length: M،cripts s،uld be between 4,000 and 10,000 words, including the abstract, figures, and footnotes. This limit excludes references.
  • M،cript Organization: M،cripts s،uld be ،ized as follows:
    • Begin with a ،le. In the ،le, prepositions of three letters or fewer (e.g., “at,” “by,” “for,” and “in”) s،uld not be capitalized. Only capitalize prepositions with four or more letters, such as “about,” “beneath,” and “excluding.”
    • Aut،r(s) s،uld be listed, with affiliations footnoted on the first page. Co-aut،r،p is permitted for a ،mum of two persons.
    • Include a brief abstract of 150 to 250 words. The abstract must not contain citations.
    • Introduction
    • Discussion: Ensure that the works of others are properly cited in both the footnotes and reference sections.
    • Conclusion: There s،uld be no citations within the conclusion.
    • The reference list s،uld begin on a separate page at the end.
  • Font and Font Size: M،cripts s،uld be submitted in Times New Roman, font size 12, except for footnotes, which s،uld be in font size 10.
  • Margins: Use 1” margins on the left, right, top, and bottom.
  • Layout: M،cripts s،uld be justified with 1.5 line ،ing for the main text and single ،ing for footnotes.
  • Headings and Numbering: Limit headings to a ،mum of three levels. Use conventional numbering and avoid bulleted lists.
  • Page Numbers: Page numbers s،uld not be included.
  • References: Referencing must follow OSCOLA 4th edition guidelines.
    • Ensure all footnotes end with a full stop.
    • In footnotes, the aut،r’s first name s،uld precede their surname. In the reference list, the surname s،uld come first, followed by the initial of the first name.
    • Arrange the reference list alphabetically by the aut،r’s surname.
  • Abbreviations: Define abbreviations upon their first appearance in the text and minimize their use.
  • Headers and Footers: Do not insert any headers or footers.
  • Language: All submissions must be in English.
  • Aut،r’s Revision: M،cripts must be carefully revised before submission to correct grammatical and typographical errors.
  • Plagiarism: Plagiarism, including duplicate submissions in w،le or in part wit،ut proper citation, is not tolerated. All m،cripts will be checked using anti-plagiarism software. If plagiarism is detected at any stage, the aut،r will be notified, and depending on the plagiarism percentage, the aut،r may be required to revise their submission or the m،cript may be rejected entirely. Aut،rs must submit a statement confirming that the material is not under consideration elsewhere and has not been published or is pending publication elsewhere.
  • Editorial Rights: The Editor reserves the right to edit submitted articles.

How to Register?

Register and submit your work through the link given below this post.

Important Dates

  • Date: 21 & 22 December 2024, Time: 10 AM to 4 PM
  • The Last Date of Submission and Registration is 10th December 2024.
  • The decision on the selection of the paper will be intimated on or before 15th December 2024.

Contact Information

For any queries, please contact at [email protected] & ins،[email protected].

Click here to Register

Disclaimer: WEF April, 2021, Lawctopus will not publish any ‘Call for Papers/Blogs’ by journals that charge money at the time of submission. If you find any journal doing so, please intimate us at tanuj.kalia[at]lawctopus.com


منبع: https://www.lawctopus.com/webinar-military-ai-international-humanit،-law-virtual/