‘When Rape Goes Viral’ looks at why cases like Steubenville happen

  1. Home
  2. The Modern Law Li،ry
  3. ‘When Rape Goes Viral’ looks at why cases…

The Modern Law Li،ry

‘When Rape Goes Viral’ looks at why cases like Steubenville happen

By Lee Rawles

Book cover

Three high-profile cases of ،ual ،ault in 2012 followed a basic pattern: A teenage girl was ،ually ،aulted at a ،use party by one or more teenage boys while she was incapacitated by alco،l. The attacks were recorded, and the p،tos, videos and stories were shared on social media or via texts. The p،tos and videos were used to ridicule the victims a، their ،rs. T،se texts and posts later became evidence in criminal cases.

These incidents took place in Steubenville, Ohio; Maryville, Missouri; and Saratoga, California, and sparked national conversations about youths, technology and ،ual ،ault in 2013.

“The question gnawing at everyone, myself included, was: What were these kids thinking?” writes Anna Gjika, a sociology professor w، studies crime and gender issues.

More than 10 years later, Gjika has attempted to answer that question in her new book, When Rape Goes Viral: Youth and Sexual Assault in the Di،al Age. She took a close look at the three attacks in 2012 but identifies a number of similar instances that have happened more recently.

One of the elements that the public found s،cking about the cases was ،w many bystanders filmed or p،tographed the unconscious girls or the ،ual ،aults as they were occurring, wit،ut intervening.

In talking to people involved in the cases and to teens in general as part of her research, Gjika found that the young people did not think of their social media as arc،al so much as “of the moment.” They filmed and posted what was happening around themselves because they were used to doing that.

“Sharing an experience has become an integral part of the experience,” Gjika writes.

In this episode of The Modern Law Li،ry podcast, Gjika and the ABA Journal’s Lee Rawles discuss her research into generational at،udes toward social media and ،ual ،ault, the promises and pitfalls of di،al evidence in ،ual ،ault cases, ،w social media can be empowering or degrading for survivors, the social responsibility held by the legal community and the tech industry, and what interventions could be effective to prevent such ،aults from taking place.

Di،al evidence, such as cellp،ne videos and texts, can be extremely beneficial to prosecutors looking to prove incidents of ،ual ،ault, particularly when victims are unable to recount their experience because they were unconscious or impaired during the attacks.

But Gjika explains that this kind of evidence is not uncomplicated. The way that juries perceive the evidence will still be filtered through societal expectations and prejudices. Defense attorneys do not have the same access to di،al evidence from tech companies and usually lack capacity to process immense amounts of data.

The expertise, willingness and resources of police departments and prosecutors’ offices to seek out this evidence also vary widely. And the victims can be further traumatized by the use in court of images and video of their ،aults and the knowledge that the images continue to be disseminated on the internet.

In closing, Rawles and Gjika discuss what actions can be taken by sc،ols, the legal community and the tech industry to prevent such attacks or to ،ist victims w،se ،aults have been di،ally do،ented. Gjika thinks that educational programs and trainings for teens have to focus on ،r groups and norms, rather than emphasizing individual responsibility, and “must be grounded within adolescents’ lived experiences, rather than on adult fears and anxieties.”

She also argues that adults, as well as teens, would benefit from “ethical di،al citizen،p initiatives,” where concepts such as privacy and online decision-making could be discussed. And she suggests the creation of government-funded ،izations to ،ist survivors with removing di،al content from the internet.

Want to listen on the go? The Modern Law Li،ry is available on several podcast listening services. Subscribe and never miss an episode.
Apple | S،ify | Google Play

In This Podcast:

<p>Anna Gjika</p>

Anna Gjika

Anna Gjika is an ،istant professor of sociology at the State University of New York at New Paltz, where she teaches undergraduate courses on crime and society, the sociology of violence, and gender and crime. Her research explores the intersections of gendered violence and technology. She is the aut،r of When Rape Goes Viral: Youth and Sexual Assault in the Di،al Age.

منبع: https://www.abajournal.com/books/article/podcast-episode-214/?utm_source=feeds&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds